Mô tả
A house (624-28 Bainbridge) that already has 4 interior parking spaces built an addition (622 Bainbridge) and added a fifth. The Streets Department granted a curb cut, but #622 was never re-zoned to authorize the changed use. The owner has pursued his curb cut despite clearly articulated neighborhood opposition and the reality of the need for public parking so close to South Street. It is a case of public good versus private entitlement. When the property owner tried to get the curb cut in 2009, it was stopped and neighbors unanimously petitioned Councilman DiCicco to have a public hearing. That never happened, nor has there been a zoning hearing or notice. We have petitioned again, this time with more anger on our block than even before.
9 Bình luậns
Asima F. X. Saad Maura (Khách)
Được thừa nhận Philly311 (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
Joel Palmer (Khách)
Please call me regarding this 215 574 5050
Joel Palmer
teb (Khách)
Nathaniel Popkin (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
Chris T. (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
Nathaniel Popkin (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
I haven't gotten anywhere with L&I. I talked to the inspector once and e-mailed him as a follow up. He told me that if I proved to him that there was an interior breech between the 2 buildings then they could do an actual inspection. Nothing happened, when I sent him that proof.
DiCicco didn't do anything at all.
I was encouraged to pursue an attorney, but the attorney didn't seem too capable and then he flaked
Will it help to try with Squilla?
I got too busy to deal with this but I'm still interested in pursuing it. I'd be up to renewing the effort--
Chris T. (Khách)
Nathaniel Popkin (Khách)